An evidenced based approach to plyometric training

The use of plyometric training was previously only seen within strength and conditioning and sport science practice. However, the programming of plyometric training is now common within many different arenas, with plyometric boxes becoming a staple piece of equipment within performance and commercial gym alike. Unfortunately, many see such equipment as an opportunity to demonstrate a maximal box jump, before sharing this feet on social media, without realising that what is really being demonstrated is hip flexion/squat depth capabilities whilst landing on a high box’ rather than actual hip height displacement. What I find more impressive, is an athlete that can perform a high box jump, and still land with the same degree of knee flexion as previously demonstrated on a box jump of a lower height. Hence, a true expression of vertical jump performance.

Another personal bug bear is the programming of plyometrics within an aerobic based fashion, with individuals performing box jumps over an extended period, and an accompanying drop in effective landing performance, poor mechanics, knee valgus, no ankle stiffness, and a general biomechanical car crash. So how should plyometrics be used, and what variables should coaches consider when programming plyometrics?

Matching the kinetics of the sport

The great Yuri Verkhoshansky first proposed the use of the ‘shock method’ to improve jumping performance in long jump and triple jump track and field athletes, with the term ‘plyometric training’ later being introduced within the west. Verkhoshansky early work involved the experimentation of depth jumps from varying heights (up to 3m) whilst recording the corresponding ground reaction forces (GRF) using force platform technology, with the aim of replicating the sort of GRF experienced by track and field athletes at the point of take-off. Hence, the purpose of the applied depth jumps was to improve jump performance by regularly subjecting athletes to the kinetic (GRF) demands of their chosen track and field jump based sports, thereby creating the right conditions for 

specific jump performance related adaptations to occur (e.g. increased muscle stiffness, reduced amortisation time, enhanced muscle spindle function and stretch reflex capabilities, etc.).

Therefore, when programming plyometrics, coaches should consider the kinetics of the movement that they are trying to enhance, and look to match the kinetics (types of GRF) within the programmed plyometrics, rather than solely aiming to match the kinematics of the same movement (joint angles, joint displacement – essentially what the movement looks like). One way this can be done is to consider how long the force is being applied for during the actual ground contact time (impulse) and categorise plyometrics into short or long contact time groups (e.g. pogo jumps or ankling vs squat jumps). For example, during maxi

mal speed running, short contact time plyometrics would more specifically mimic the ground contact times that occur whilst sprinting at top speeds, whereas long contact time plyometrics would be more suited to the acceleration phase of a sprint, as ground contact time is greater due to the need to overcome inertia. Likewise, the playing surface of an athletes chosen sport should also be considered when selecting short or long contact time plyometrics. For example, an athlete that plays on a soft surface may benefit more from long contact time based plyometrics that focus on absorbing force, whe

reas an athlete who competes on a hard court may benefit more from short contact time, elastic/recoil based plyometrics. Therefore, when programming plyometrics, coaches should consider the kinetics associated with the movement that is being enhanced, and the playing surface during actual competition, and replicate this accordingly. For more information on plyometric training, look out for effective plyometric programming part two, and remember, base plyometrics training on the sport, and not your ego!

Newsletter: June 2021

In this month’s newsletter I’d like to talk to you about Mentorship, a term that has become more and more common in recent years. So much so that I’m not sure anyone really understands what it means any more! I first became acquainted with the term as a mentee when as a teenager, I was obsessed with martial arts but had no real idea how

Read More »

Newsletter: May 2021

Is persistence enough? When we think about what it takes to achieve success lots of words come to mind….passion, drive, work ethic, etc etc. Personally I often think resourcefulness and persistence are a key part of the equation. Just having that ability to see things through even when it’s not going your way. But I don’t think persistence alone is enough, that could result in just

Read More »

8 Points for a Better Performance Programme

Want to get more from your clients’ performance programmes? Try these 8 Points for a Better Performance Programme from our CEO, Brendan Chaplin. With over a decade of experience in coaching athletes at many different levels of performance, he’s identified some trends that great programmes exhibit, that get big results! Below are his ‘golden rules’ to consider when it comes to programming for performance. This

Read More »

7 Easy Steps to Set Goals

Whilst 2020 hasn’t been the year we expected, you can still set your goals and achieve them. In fact, there has never been a more important time to focus on what you truly want from your career. Below are a few points from our CEO Brendan Chaplin to help you plan and simplify this process and provide you with key goal setting principles. Step 1

Read More »

Elite Coach Mentorship Student Success Stories

  We don’t just say we will get results… we make it happen! This article is here for anyone thinking about joining our Elite Coach Mentorship, we want to inspire and celebrate with you the Elite Coach Mentorship student success stories. Jonny Williams had been working overseas for 17 years, he started a gym business back in 2017 but it had always been in the

Read More »

Strength Training For Children & Young Adults

Should children do strength training? A controversial and highly debated topic. Here we look at strength training for children, Strength Coach Nick Grantham’s view and explore some of the common questions when it comes to training our younger population. If you are looking to skip straight to our youth S&C courses head to this page on our YSCA. As adults, it is now becoming increasingly

Read More »

Find out more about 0% finance options
Call us on 0113 8591406 or pop in your details below and we will call you straight back!

Complete the details below to be sent further details on our Level 4:

By entering your contact details you agree to receive our marketing communications in line with our privacy policy

Register your details

By entering your contact details you agree to receive our marketing communications in line with our privacy policy